Note: The following is an email exchange between myself and Justin Cannon. Mr. Cannon is founder of Inclusive Orthodoxy; a website that promotes homosexuality, i.e. sexual relations between two human beings of the same sex. Mr. Cannon believes that such conduct is sanctioned in the Bible. He holds a Bachelor of Arts from Earlham College and a Master of Divinity from Church Divinity School of the Pacific in Berkeley, CA.
Some Questions To Answer
Tuesday, May 4, 2010 10:02 PM
From: “roach david” <roachd61@yahoo.com>
To: justincannon@truthsetsfree.net
Mr. Cannon,
In view of your position that homosexual conduct is in harmony with biblical teaching I have a few questions I was hoping you could answer.
1. Does the Bible, specifically the New Covenant, condemn fornication/sexual immorality?
2. According to the Bible, specifically the New Covenant: If two college students, a young man of 22 and a young woman of 21, both unmarried, are engaging in consensual sexual relations with each other, would such relations between the two constitute fornication/sexual immorality?
3. According to the Bible, specifically the New Covenant: If two college students, a young woman of 23 and a young woman of 22, both unmarried, are engaging in consensual sexual relations with each other, would such relations between the two constitute fornication/sexual immorality?
4. If fornication/sexual immorality is not occurring in either of the two cases presented, please share a scenario in which it would be occurring.
Note: If you object to the term “fornication/sexual immorality” simply replace it with the word “sin”.
Thank you in advance for your answers.
D. Roach I
Re: Some Questions To Answer
Wednesday, May 5, 2010 12:52 AM
From: “Justin Cannon” <cannonboy@gmail.com>
To: “roach david” <roachd61@yahoo.com>
Hello,
Can you please tell me what your intent in asking these questions is?
In Christ,
Justin R. Cannon
Intent of my questions
Wednesday, May 5, 2010 7:06 AM
From: “roach david” <roachd61@yahoo.com>
To: cannonboy@gmail.com
Mr. Cannon,
My intent or purpose is two fold:
(1) Information- Information, if accurate, will help me to make better decisions about how I live and what I teach. I am sure that this is one of your purposes as well.
(2) Related to the issue of information- I believe the Bible and want to teach it accurately. I do not want to teach that certain conduct is sinful if the Bible does not. I do not want to tell someone that they have no right to be with another person sexually if God permits it. If I do then I am not being faithful to God or those I am trying to teach. I will answer to God for that. Each of these applies to you as well.
On your website (inclusiveorthodoxy.org) it reads- After years of study and prayer, Justin came to learn that the Bible only condemns homosexual activity within contexts of prostitution, pederasty, and otherwise cultic and abusive practices. According to his study, The Bible, Christianity, and Homosexuality, nothing in the Bible comes close to condemning a loving, committed, romantic, monogamous gay relationship.
My conclusions from the biblical text are the opposite. I believe the implications of your position are staggering. I believe the questions I pose demonstrate that. If this is not the case please share with me why.
Again I thank you in advance for your answers to my initial questions.
Sincerely,
D. Roach I
Re: Intent of my questions
Wednesday, May 5, 2010 10:27 AM
From: “Justin Cannon” <cannonboy@gmail.com>
To: “roach david” <roachd61@yahoo.com>
Hello,
Thank you for clarifying your views and where you are coming from.
It sounds like you have come to your own conclusions about those questions (an opposite opinion of mine), and are simply trying to fertilize the ground for a debate. I do not engage in debates, I am sorry.
If it’s just information you are looking for, I can suggest some books on this topic including Dirt, Greed, and Sex: Sexual Ethics in the New Testament and Their Implications for Today by L. William Countryman. I think it addresses many of the questions you are exploring. http://astore.amazon.com/truthsetsfree-20/detail/0800638484/177-9950618-4866360
Justin
Thanks For The AnswersWednesday, May 5, 2010 2:46 PM
From: “roach david” <roachd61@yahoo.com
To: cannonboy@gmail.com
Mr. Cannon,
I have come to some conclusions. I stated that my conclusions were opposite of yours in my second email. Whether or not those conclusions are correct is another issue, hence the reason for contacting you. (Note: I capitalize for emphasis).
I never mentioned debate. I asked some elementary Bible questions. It is disappointing that you question motive instead of answering the questions, at least explicitly. I only hope you don’t treat any other inquiries in this manner.
If YOUR answers to the questions I sent are opposite of mine and MY answers are “YES” in BOTH instances then YOUR answers must be “NO”. Did you ever think as a Bible believer you would answer “no” to whether consenting young men and young women could commit sexual immorality? I hope you will think about that.
In your desire to legitimize homosexual conduct you unwittingly must legitimized ALL sexual conduct between consenting human beings. You cannot, upon biblical grounds, condemn any sexual conduct between consenting human beings. These are the implications of your position.
I inquire not simply for information but the right information. What good is information if that information is not correct, truthful, or accurate? I assure you that NONE of the books you can suggest have considered the questions I have raised, including Mr. William Countryman’s. If you know of one specifically that does let me know.
If you know of someone else who can answer the questions I asked please feel free to share them with those persons.
Thanks for your time.
Sincerely,
D. Roach I